Home
Introduction
What is F.P?
History of F.P (1)
History of F.P (2)
Credibility
The F. Psychologist
Ethical Practice
Career Guidance
Criminal Profiling 1
Criminal Profiling 2
Criminal Profiling 3
Geo Profiling
Prof. David Canter
Become a Profiler?
The Psychopath
Psych Autopsy
Psych Testing
Witness Memory
Eyewitness Info
Jury Selection
False Confessions
Forensic Psy Blog
Forensic Psy Books
Book of the Month
Conferences
F.P Toolbar
Quality Links
FP Search Engine
F. Psych 2.0
Q & A
Free Newsletter
Expert Articles
FP Degrees (USA)
Alabama
Colorado
FP Degrees (UK)
FP Degrees (INT)
Study F.P Online
Criminal Justice
Study C.J Online
Forensic Science
F.Sci Degree (US)
CSI Info (Page 1)
CSI Info (page 2)
Psychology Blogs
Research Advice
Exp Design Tutorial
Exp Ref Guide
Tutorial Part 2
Research Subjects
APA Referencing
Student Debt
Great Free Stuff
Escapism Zone
Earn Money Online
UK Psychology
Forensic Videos
Murder Mystery
Forensic Gift Ideas
Forensic Shop
Sign Guestbook
Terms of Use
Share This Website
Contact Me
Advertise With Us
Free eBooks
Serial Killers

[?] Subscribe To
This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Add to Newsgator
Subscribe with Bloglines

                                    

The Scientific Credibility of Forensic Psychology


Scientific credibility?

As a forensic discipline, forensic psychology can be located within the broader discourse of forensic science. However, compared to other forensic specialisms e.g. forensic pathology, forensic odontology etc, forensic psychology is often seen as the poor relation.

As with psychology in general, it is often perceived, particularly by those outside the discipline as soft or pseudo science. Now while this is often based on a misunderstanding of the practice of psychology, it's not difficult to understand why this viewpoint prevails.

Take for instance criminal profiling, which rightly or wrongly is often presented as a topic within forensic psychology. There are a host of examples where criminal profiling has been shown to be inaccurate. The Washington sniper case being the most obvious example.

Profiles indicated that a white man working alone was responsible. In the event, two black men, John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo were arrested and sentenced to life in prison for the killings.

The American Academy of Forensic Sciences cites accuracy and precision as the cornerstone of professional practice, which makes perfect sense for a society dedicated to the application of science to the law.

Now while it is possible to argue that so called 'hard' sciences can also be found wanting when it comes to accuracy and precision, I'd suggest a more constructive approach, particularly for students of forensic psychology would be to seek out a more balanced view when it comes to defending or evaluating the scientific credibility of forensic psychology.

Criminal profiling represents a very clear case in point. For a start, there is more than one approach to criminal profiling, the theoretical principles of which can differ markedly. While it is possible to point to certain explanatory frameworks as subjective and untestable, equally, it is possible to point to objective and testable statistical procedures being employed.

The ability to compare and contrast a range of approaches and evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses is an effective learning strategy and should be employed as a matter of course within forensic psychology.


Looking For Something In Particular? Try Google Search

Google
Webwww.all-about-forensic-psychology.com


Back To Top Of The Page

Return Home From The Scientific Credibility Page

                                    



footer for scientific credibility page